As you can
see, the group project is a very important aspect in determining your grade.
Typically, teams consisting of 4 to 6 students will be formed, and
suggested topics for the group project will be handed out as the semester
progresses. You are free to choose your own topics, as long as the
instructor approves each project topic and its scope.
I
encourage you to start thinking about (as soon as possible)
.
Feel free
to discuss any ideas with the instructor at any time.
Mandatory
You must
read the following sections from Dr. Debra Richardson’s URL:
http://www.ics.uci.edu/~djr/classes/ics125/project.html#coordination
Most of what
is said in these sections is also applicable for this course.
The project grade (for all teams) is broken up as follows, with percentages:
|
|
Project Phase |
% Of total class grade |
|
1 |
Proposal |
2% |
|
2 |
Logical Model |
6% |
|
3 |
DDL |
4% |
|
4 |
Team Grade |
2% |
|
5 |
PowerPoint Presentation |
4% |
|
6 |
Final Report |
6% |
|
7 |
Demo |
6% |
Each of
these phases is described below.
As the semester
progresses, each team will need to fill up the following table:
|
Team
# |
Team
Members |
Captain |
Group
Project Description |
Team
Name |
|
1 |
Alyssa Reinhart, Boat Charoensombud, Courtney Norris,
Gautam Sapre, Jacob Casiano, Nicholas Robinson |
Nicholas Robinson |
Database for a coffee house
(one of our group members is going to be opening a coffee house) |
Team
Caffeine |
|
2 |
Alex Blackmur, Eric Seufert, Keith Wagner, Ben Tillman, Michael Johnson,
Justin Burke, Sheng Ma |
Alex Blackmur |
We plan to make a database of all Academy Award
nominees, and winners and the related information for each movie, since the
inception of the academy awards. |
Team
Friendship |
|
3 |
Amanda Pasquali, Sean Fitzgerald, Drennan Travers
Fuller, Usman Moon, David Herlambang, Brian Kachmar |
Amanda Pasquali |
Amanda's Biomedical Engineering professor, Dr.
Richards-Kortum, is conducting a research project with her BME 301 class to
determine how students learn and what activities help them learn
better. We will be designing a database to keep track of student
participation data that is recorded for each of Dr. Richards-Kortum's class
lectures. |
DBMS Dawgs |
|
4 |
Carlee Patterson, Chris
Shaffer, Erik Stark, Michael Donley, Shatayu
Bhattacharyya (aka "Shy"), Otis Tucker |
Carlee Patterson |
Team OUTCAS intends
to design and create a database that allows maintenance of
information on chemicals used in an Organic
chemistry research lab here on the UT campus.
Key entities are chemical bottles with varying attributes such as bottle
size, CAS number, shelf location within
lab and relationships to other chemicals such as reactivity. |
OUTCAS |
|
5 |
David
Grau, Aaron Richardson, Junita Sari, Hong Tran, Jochen
Teizer, Mustansir Abbas |
David
Grau |
Integration
of construction data for improving project analysis and control |
Project
Control |
|
6 |
Kaitian Wang, Dennis Nye,
David Lee Griffith, Charles Knight, Sami Khan |
Kaitian Wang |
Dynamic schema user management |
Team 420 |
|
7 |
Dan Katz, Greg
Carter, Long Le, Andrew Timm, Drew Bradford, Shirley Truong |
Dan
Katz |
“What’s for
Dinner” (A recipe database with meal planning capabilities and the option to print
out organized and logical shopping lists) |
E-culinar |
The
Project Proposal is a 1-page MS-Word document that highlights:
The instructor
will then review this project proposal. This proposal is also the starting
point for the Project Report to be submitted at the end of the course.
Each team will
get an opportunity to meet with the instructor for ~ 30 minutes. Along with the
project proposal, all constraints, assumptions, functional dependencies will be
reviewed in order to attempt defining what part of the “real world” this
project is going to model. Be prepared to ask as many questions as you can.
Also, write down, as many requirements from your users that you think would be
pertinent for the project.
Time
Slots:
Each team
captain needs to send an email to the instructor, signing up for the appropriate
timings (on a first come first serve basis)
|
Slot
# |
Date |
Time |
Team
Name |
|
1 |
2004-03-12 |
|
Project
Control |
|
2 |
2004-03-12 |
|
Team
420 |
|
3 |
2004-03-12 |
|
Team
Friendship |
|
4 |
2004-03-12 |
|
OUTCAS |
|
5 |
2004-03-12 |
|
Team
Caffeine |
|
6 |
2004-03-12 |
|
E-culinar |
|
7 |
2004-03-12 |
|
DBMS
Dawgs |
NOTE: All meetings will take place in
the instructor’s office.
This phase
of the project will account for 6% of the course. As part of the deliverables,
I expect
The Project
Report must include
a) The project proposal that you
submitted earlier, with any modifications. This must include things that you
are going to deliver as part of this project as well as, things that you are
NOT going to deliver as part of this project, and maybe flag them as future
enhancements. I.e. Phase II etc. You do want to show that you have thought
through some of the issues beyond the project, but in interest of time, you may
not be able to achieve those.
b) All functional dependencies. The
schema must be in at least 3NF, otherwise, explicit reasons
need to be stated as to why your schema is not in 3NF. Preferably, submit
functional dependency diagrams similar to lab2.
c) Some description of application
interfaces (UI screens etc.)-Not necessarily complete.
d) Some description of Work Flow for
the intended audience. (Use cases)-not necessarily complete. Work Flow includes
the UI screens, including the order in which a user will navigate through the
screens to achieve a certain task. Each such “navigation path” is deemed a use
case. E.g. “Search for a book by title on www.amazon.com”
is a use case that probably comprises of 3 or 4 UI screens (in some particular
order). “Buy a book on www.amazon.com” is
another example of a use case.
The ER
diagram must include
a) Entities, Relationships (along with
appropriate cardinalities), Optional / Mandatory, Weak / Strong entities,
Attributes, RI (Referential Integrity) definitions i.e. PK (Primary Key) and FK
(Foreign Key) attributes need to be clearly labeled. Use IDEF1X notation if
possible, otherwise Extended ER notation.
No
programming language code is required to be submitted; neither is any SQL code
required.
Next
Steps:
Hence,
this will require the group to be split up in essentially 3 roles:
A) Role Front-End Developers:
Responsibility includes
B) Role Business Logic Developers:
Responsibility includes
C) Role Database Schema Implementors:
Responsibility includes
This step
consists of submitting all the SQL statements required to
Any other
settings required for transforming the logical model into the physical.
From the
above, the required DDL are
For example, if your stored procedure looks like
CREATE PROCEDURE titles_sum @TITLE
varchar (40) = '%', @SUM money OUTPUT
AS
BEGIN
SELECT 'Title Name' = title
FROM titles
WHERE title LIKE @TITLE
SELECT @SUM = SUM (price)
FROM titles
WHERE title LIKE @TITLE
END
Then, what you need to submit is just the “header” viz.
CREATE PROCEDURE titles_sum @TITLE
varchar (40) = '%', @SUM money OUTPUT
With some English description of what
this procedure is supposed to do.
The rest
of the DDL is optional, but dependent on your project. For example, if
your project requires creating users, and privileges, then submit the DDL for
doing so. Similarly, for triggers, submit only the headers, and not the body
containing SQL statements.
For the
project, any INDEXES will be considered for bonus points.
Each group
member will be required to grade his or her respective team members (excluding
themselves) on the following criteria:
These
criteria (and any more) will be discussed in the first day of class.
Each
member will submit a cumulative score (out of 100) for their respective team
members and mail them to me confidentially.
In the
last couple of weeks of the course, there will be PowerPoint presentations by
each team. Each team will prepare no more than 5 or 6 slides, and present the
topic to the rest of the class in a 10-minute presentation, followed by 5
minutes of Q&A.
Email to the instructor, the electronic copy of the PowerPoint presentation with the following 5/6 slides:
NOTE: You are free to do more slides, as long as you can do the presentation in 15 minutes.
There will be presentations in this class (15 minutes each), with question/answers. Each team must decide who (all) is/are going to present.
The class will start at 8.30 a.m. promptly.
Attendance is required/mandatory during ALL presentations. If you miss these classes, your whole team will be penalized for some portion of the project.
Each team captain needs to email the instructor as to when his or her team would like to present.
Presentation time slots:
|
Slot
# |
Date |
Time |
Team
Name |
|
1 |
2004-04-26 |
8.45am |
Team 420 |
|
2 |
2004-04-26 |
9.00am |
Team
Caffeine |
|
3 |
2004-04-26 |
9.15am |
e-culinar |
|
4 |
2004-04-26 |
9.30am |
Team
Friendship |
|
5 |
2004-04-30 |
8.45am |
OUTCAS |
|
6 |
2004-04-30 |
9.00am |
Project
Control |
|
7 |
2004-04-30 |
9.15am |
DBMS
Dawgs |
Also, on
the due date, each team will submit a project report (in electronic, preferably
MS-Word for Windows format, and print format) outlining:
Bound copy of project report must be brought and
submitted in class on the due date. In addition, an electronic copy needs to be
emailed to the instructor.
In
addition to the presentation, the team will provide a live demo in 10 minutes,
followed by 5 minutes of Q&A. All demos will take place in the lab.
The instructor and/or the TA at the end of the course will test the project LIVE. During the team demo, all team members of the team giving the demo are required to attend. If you miss this class, your whole team will be penalized for some portion of the project. The attendance of the rest is optional. If you have your demo on laptops, make sure you get it to the lab.
Each team captain needs to email the instructor as to when his or her team would like to give the demo.
Demo time slots:
|
Slot
# |
Date |
Time |
Team
Name |
|
1 |
2004-04-30 |
10.00am |
|
|
2 |
2004-04-30 |
10.15am |
|
|
3 |
2004-04-30 |
10.30am |
|
|
4 |
2004-05-03 |
9.05am |
OUTCAS |
|
5 |
2004-05-03 |
9.20am |
DBMS
Dawgs |
|
6 |
2004-05-03 |
9.35am |
Project
Control |
|
7 |
2004-05-03 |
9.50am |
Team
Caffeine |
|
8 |
2004-05-03 |
10.05am |
Team
Friendship |
|
9 |
2004-05-03 |
10.20am |
e-culinar |
|
10 |
2004-05-03 |
10.35am |
Team 420 |
The grade
on the project will be determined by
§
Submitted
Project Report
§
Team
members grading each other
§
Scope/Depth/Features
of DBMS etc. of project
§
Design
of the project
§
Implementation
of the project
§
End
of class presentation and LIVE demo
§
Electronic
copy of the project
§
Comments
in Source+SQL+Modelling code+GUI code
§
Submitted
Project Proposal
§
Submitted
Logical Model
§
Submitted
DDL
Last Updated: 4/21/2004 9:06:17 AM