This list of links is largely based on Cynthia Leong's annotated bibliography of

Who's Doing What in the History of Computing in Academia

 

 

The material that I have added regarding cataloging digital archives is in bold and underlined!!!!  C. Lam Nguyen

Universities and Colleges

My school/institution wants what you are creating, how do I get it? 

Please do let us know of your interest by sending a message to Eric Celeste at efc@mit.edu . At this early stage we really have nothing ready to share, but we are very interested in distributing our work as broadly as possible as it matures.

How does this relate to Barton? 

Barton is the catalog of resources acquired by the MIT Libraries from publishers and authors worldwide. Barton also includes references to digital material licensed by MIT Libraries and to some electronic material on the net that our librarians feel is of particular importance to our community. DSpace contains actual documents created by MIT faculty and researchers, as well as the "metadata" which describes those documents. Barton may well acquire links to documents which reside in DSpace, but the mission of Barton as a "catalog" is quite distinct from that of DSpace as a "repository". 

Will we "catalog" all the submissions and put them into Barton?

While some documents in DSpace will certainly be cataloged in Barton, we don't expect that such inclusion in Barton will ever be universal. However, the MIT Libraries is working on a separate track to build a more unified environment for searching which would help researchers discover material from a number of sources, from Barton to DSpace to many of our licensed databases. 

Who owns the metadata you house in this repository? 

The general problem of rights management, including the metadata ownership, is very complex and will be the subject of intense study during the project. If metadata is created by DSpace, then presumably it is "owned" by the MIT Libraries. Otherwise it is our intent to let authors retain as much ownership as is practical of the DSpace content.

Will I have to describe/index my own material? 

Maybe. Metatdata is a tricky thing. Different communities have different vocabularies and standards for describing and indexing their materials. The best descriptions and indicies are often a lot of effort, even for the authors. Our plan is to make the submission as effortless as possible. We hope that by creating different communities within DSpace, rich and accurate descriptions and indicies will be made without requiring authors to do all the work themselves. 

Will there be any automated indexing? 

We expect so. But we do not yet know what form it will take. 

How truly searchable will this archive be? 

We expect DSpace to incorporate its own searching facility and technology. But DSpace will also be designed to share metadata with other services which may provide their own paths to DSpace content. The experience of our predecessors has shown that letting web crawling robots indiscriminately walk entire collections does not work. Perhaps, through more controlled collaborations, novel third party indexing schemes might be allowed in to some large subset of the collection.

How do you intend to preserve data and documents in the face of changing technologies and standards? 

This is currently a research problem. We don't presume to know how to solve it. What we intend to do is set policies to encourage people to use standards and formats that have the best longevity, and widest acceptance. As DSpace gains in stature, we hope to be able to influence the direction of formats and standards towards greater longevity. Some communities need functionality more than longevity for their materials. We intend to be very up front with those communities: Some formats will not be able to be migrated. Such items will be kept for historical record, and may require emulation to fully utilize. Charles Babbage Institute CBI has a pretty good cataloging system in place.They have searches that allow you to go through their collections, but they catalog their material into several different collections and each collection is a set of boxes.It?s exactly the same as the printout that the CBI librarian sent you for the materials that you requested.This isn?t the best way to go about cataloging a digital archive, but it suits their needs/boxed materials well.

Societies