From owner-sigcommex@PASCAL.ACM.ORG Wed Sep 17 05:06:06 1997
Received: from PASCAL.ACM.ORG (PASCAL.ACM.ORG [192.135.174.1])
	by mail.cs.utexas.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id FAA15884
	for <dragon@cs.utexas.edu>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 05:06:05 -0500 (CDT)
Resent-From: owner-sigcommex@PASCAL.ACM.ORG
Received: from mail.acm.org ("port 2744"@mail.acm.org)
 by PASCAL.ACM.ORG (PMDF V5.1-5 #22743) id <01INQJXICY3400SJKT@PASCAL.ACM.ORG>
 for dragon@cs.utexas.edu; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 05:05:54 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.acm.org ("port 2744"@mail.acm.org)
 by PASCAL.ACM.ORG (PMDF V5.1-5 #22743)
 with ESMTP id <01INQJUR2M9O00PP4F@PASCAL.ACM.ORG>; Wed,
 17 Sep 1997 05:03:37 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from PASCAL.ACM.ORG ([192.135.174.1]) by mail.acm.org (8.8.5/8.7.5)
 with ESMTP id GAA45598 for <SIGCOMMEX-expand@acm.org>; Wed,
 17 Sep 1997 06:08:39 -0400
Received: from PASCAL.ACM.ORG by PASCAL.ACM.ORG (PMDF V5.1-5 #22743)
 id <01INQJUKKCTS00QILF@PASCAL.ACM.ORG> for SIGCOMMEX-expand@acm.org; Wed,
 17 Sep 1997 05:03:28 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from mail.acm.org ("port 2728"@mail.acm.org)
 by PASCAL.ACM.ORG (PMDF V5.1-5 #22743)
 with ESMTP id <01INQJU91A2S00PP4F@PASCAL.ACM.ORG> for sigcommex; Wed,
 17 Sep 1997 05:03:12 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk (bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk [128.16.5.31])
 by mail.acm.org (8.8.5/8.7.5) with SMTP id GAA22262 for <sigcommex@acm.org>;
 Wed, 17 Sep 1997 06:08:15 -0400
Received: from waffle.cs.ucl.ac.uk by bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk with local SMTP id
 <g.12153-0@bells.cs.ucl.ac.uk>; Wed, 17 Sep 1997 11:02:45 +0100
Resent-date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 05:03:27 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Sep 1997 11:02:43 +0100
From: Jon Crowcroft <J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: SIGCOMM 98 Vancouver?
In-reply-to: "Your message of Thu, 03 Oct 1996 07:51:28 PDT."
 <"14049*neufeld@cs.ubc.ca"@MHS>
To: Gerald Neufeld <neufeld@cs.ubc.ca>
Cc: "Jonathan M. Smith" <jms@central.cis.upenn.edu> (return),
        gdelp@vnet.ibm.com (return), J.Crowcroft@cs.ucl.ac.uk
Cc: sigcommex@acm.org
Errors-to: owner-sigcommex@PASCAL.ACM.ORG
Resent-message-id: <199709171008.GAA45598@mail.acm.org>
Message-id: <1211.874490563@cs.ucl.ac.uk>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; CHARSET=US-ASCII
Status: OR



 Gerald

some things that just came up in sigcomm97, that we should do for '98

1/ childcare information - we don't have to _do_ anything, but at
least finding out what type of minding/babysitting, or clubs are
avaialble and making it part of pre-registration information -
however, if there _is_ a service we can buy, I am prepared to spend
SIG money to help people attend who need such a service

2/ Speaker information - we havnt i nthe past given speaker
guidelines, but its clear that some talks this year were marred by
poor slides (exception: pouzin's lovely keynote:-) 

we should (as per IEEE conferences) find some standard info we can
send to speakers when we get their final papers, that give typical A/V
guidelines (your university may have some yo ucan use - we do....for
example -= things like pointsize, no. of lines per slide, size of
diagrams/# colors, etc - that sort of stuff!)(

3/ we'd like to make absolutely sure we have the '99 call for papers
available at '98 (not your problem, but just for my record!)

4/ exit questionnaires - everyone leaves this to the last second (i
did in 94, christophe did til today....etc) - craig did a really nice
job at stanford, so we should use that model......we're just trying to
get those forms off craig now....

cheers

jon
 



From owner-sigcomm98-exec@cs.ubc.ca Thu Oct  9 13:28:04 1997
Received: from grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (grolsch.cs.ubc.ca [142.103.6.9])
	by mail.cs.utexas.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA21017
	for <dragon@cs.utexas.edu>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 13:27:31 -0500 (CDT)
Received: (from majordom@localhost) by grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (8.8.5/8.6.9) id LAA15507 for sigcomm98-exec-outgoing; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:27:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cs.utexas.edu (root@cs.utexas.edu [128.83.139.9]) by grolsch.cs.ubc.ca (8.8.5/8.6.9) with ESMTP id LAA15477 for <sigcomm98-exec@cs.ubc.ca>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 11:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from bigbird.cs.utexas.edu (dragon@bigbird.cs.utexas.edu [128.83.143.202])
	by cs.utexas.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA12514
	for <sigcomm98-exec@cs.ubc.ca>; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 13:26:19 -0500 (CDT)
Received: by bigbird.cs.utexas.edu (8.8.5/Client-1.5)
	id NAA21348; Thu, 9 Oct 1997 13:26:16 -0500
Message-Id: <199710091826.NAA21348@bigbird.cs.utexas.edu>
From: "Chris Edmondson-Yurkanan" <dragon@cs.utexas.edu>
Date: Thu, 9 Oct 1997 13:26:15 -0500
X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.6 beta(3) 11/17/96)
To: sigcomm98-exec@cs.ubc.ca
Subject: fyi: feedback on sigcomm97
Precedence: bulk
X-Mozilla-Status: 0000
X-Status: 
Status: OR

Christophe Diot just sent out the evaluation summary from the conference
questionnaire:  On the scale, 5 was positive and 1 was low....
Thanks, Chris

#
#EVALUATION OF SIGCOMM 97
#
#Students : 19
#Academic : 13
#Research : 10
#Industry : 16
#
#How did you hear about conference
#
#Last year's conference : 18
#web                    : 19
#email                  :  7
#journal                :  2
#direct mail (post)     :  2
#Other : freind (2), lab's director, manager, mailing list, general
#office
#
#
#Quality of the conference
#                    	   1   2   3   4   5
#-----------------------------------------------------
#Location                   1   0   3   13  43
#Conference facilities      3   4   8   22  22
#Internet access            5   11  12  11   7
#Food                       9   14  16  12   9
#Social events              1   3   14  28  11
#Presentations (visu)       3   3   16  27  10
#Presentations (tech)       2   4   9   32  13
#Hotels                     1   2   15  17  10
#Local Information          1   1   15  25  14
#
#Locations for future years :
#Australia (3), USA, Boston, Italia, Paris, Venise, Hawaii (2), Florence,
#Beijing, Joannesbourg, Sydney, Europe (3), China, California, Stokholm,
#Tierra del fuego, Ibiza, India (2), Cannes, Santa Fee, London,
#Anaheim, Oslo, Tokyo.
#
#>Personal note: there is a corelation between the proposed location and the
#>conference evaluation. In particular:
#>
#>- all those that proposed Asia critized the lack of vegetarian food.
#>- most of those that proposed USA critized food and Internet connectivity
#
#Proposals for next year tutorials :
#
#Developments in Mobile Data Networks
#Join source and channel coding
#Routing, IP switching
#Policy based management
#Quality of service: is it achievable the Internet
#Mobility management, wireless networks
#IPV6 (2)
#Real time comm., QoS
#ATM
#Multicast
#
#Comments :
#
#- Please ensure that no-meet eaters do get something to eat.
#- Good Internet connectivity and performance is essential !
#- warm + beaches == GREAT ! Thanks
#- access to food was hard, we like to eat on sits
#- Great banquet
#- Expected better food, facilities and Internet access at a high
#profile place like Palais des festivals.
#- So, how was I to find out was vegetarian food ? A pathetically
#starving graduate student
#- Too many simulations and observations without ideas or analysis
#- too many talks belaboring the obvious IMHO
#- too few terminals for internet access
#- Pool session could have been held earlier, so we could plan to go
#out for meal after words. Too many presentations were on
#performance. It would have been nice to have more variety and more new
#ideas. I thought that was the purpose of sigcomm. Also, with so few
#papers accepted, accepting two from the same author is unfair to
#rejected authors.
#- We need more papers about NEW interesting ideas that, while perhaps
#not fully developed yet, provide for more interesting talks and
#discussions than solutions to small technical problems (there are also
#needed, but not in such big guarantities).
#- Too much measurement papers, not enough conclusions !
#- The volumteer staff was great !
#- VEGETARIAN FOOD, PLEASE !!
#- The problem should be solved one and for all ?? irritating
#- The food was high in QUALITY, but actually getting any food was very
#hard. The lunches with tiny plates, LONG lines + ??? food left many
#of us very hungry. I ended up going grocery shopping so I wouldn't be
#so hungry. The banquet had delicious food but was poorly
#organized. Nobody at my table knew about the HOT food so we all just
#had cold buffet salads. This is a shame.
#- with the exception of the banquet, food was sub-starderd
#- Good technical content, ok presentations, some poor "french openning
#! does not work well ! Buffets at lunch not well done
#- Wine and Cheese reception disappointing - full reception. Nice lunch
#
#
#-- 
#==========================================================================
#Christophe Diot                 	| tel. 	  +33 493 65 77 56 
#INRIA					| fax. 	  +33 493 65 77 65	
#2004 route des Lucioles - BP 93		| e.mail  christophe.diot@inria.fr
#06902 SOPHIA ANTIPOLIS cedex		| Web page http://www.inria.fr/rodeo/
#FRANCE
#
#Disclaimer: 	
#
#le contenu de ce mail, ainsi que les opinions qui y sont developpees, 
#n'engagent que moi ... et encore !

