Subject: RE: CFP - final version
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2001 12:20:22 -0400

Chris,

There's no "Policy", per say. The recommendation is to use the international 
style so as not to be so American Centric.

-Erica


>-----Original Message-----
>From: Chris Edmondson-Yurkanan
>To: Vivian M. Benton, Erica Johnson
>
>Sent: 8/16/01 9:12 AM
>Subject: Re: CFP - final version
>
>I have been fighting a losing battle over these dates in prior SIGCOMMs.
>But ACM has adopted this as important to them.
>
>
>ERICA:  is it still an ACM policy to use the international style of
>dates?
>
>                i.e. 19-23 August 2001    vs   August 19-23, 2002
>
>Thanks, Chris
>
>>>
>>> 	go ahead and switch the dates to international style, and anything
>>>     ....
>>>     Chris
>>
>>
>>is this an absolute? i really think the international style is ugly and
>>not as "pleasing" to read. also, i see it wasn't done for 2000 on either the
>>CFP or AP
>>
>>vivian