Paper review: PAPER TITLE

Reviewer: REVIEWER NAME

1. Summarize the (at most) 3 key main ideas (each in 1 sentence.)

2. State the main contribution of the paper

3. Rate how convincing the methodology is

Consider questions like: Do the claims and conclusions follow from the experiments? Are the assumptions realistic? Are the experiments well designed? Are there different experiments that would be more convincing? Are there other alternatives the authors should have considered or compared against? (And, of course, is the paper free of methodological errors.)

4. Answer one of the following four questions (whichever is most relevant for this paper): What lessons should system researchers and builders take away from this work. What is the lasting impact of this work? What (if any) questions does this work leave open? What is the most significant limitation of this work?