Critique

Paper title:
Authors:
Conference/Journal:
Date:
URL:

1) Briefly (1 paragraph) summarize the paper
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2) What would the authors would say the main contribution of the paper is?
 
 
 

3) What do you think is the most important thing about the paper?
 
 
 
 

4) What is the most serious flaw or limitation about the approach advocated in the paper?
 
 
 

5) What is good about the experimental methodology? What is bad? Is the experimental methodology convincing?
 
 
 

6) What questions does this paper leave unanswered or as future work?