@COMMENT This file was generated by bib2html.pl version 0.90
@COMMENT written by Patrick Riley
@COMMENT This file came from Peter Stone's publication pages at
@COMMENT http://www.cs.utexas.edu/~pstone/papers
@InProceedings{ATT08-dresner,
author="Kurt Dresner and Peter Stone",
title="Mitigating Catastrophic Failure at Intersections of Autonomous Vehicles",
booktitle="{AAMAS} Workshop on Agents in Traffic and Transportation",
address="Estoril, Portugal",
month="May", year="2008",
pages="78--85",
abstract={
Fully autonomous vehicles promise enormous gains in safety,
efficiency, and economy for transportation. However, before such
gains can be realized, a plethora of safety and reliability concerns
must be addressed. In previous work, we have introduced a system
for managing autonomous vehicles at intersections that is capable of
handling more vehicles and causing fewer delays than modern-day
mechanisms such as traffic lights and stop
signs. While the system is safe under
normal operating conditions, we have not discussed the possibility
or implications of unforeseen mechanical failures. Because the
system orchestrates such precarious ``close calls'' the tolerance
for such errors is very low. In this paper, we make four main
contributions. First, we introduce safety features of the system
designed to deal with these types of failures. Second, we perform a
basic failure mode analysis, demonstrating that without these
features, the system is unsuitable for deployment due to a
propensity for catastrophic failure modes. Third, we give extensive
empirical evidence suggesting that not only is this method
effective, but that it is so even when normal communications are
disrupted. Finally, we provide an analysis of the data indicating
that despite the apparent potential for disastrous accidents,
autonomous intersection management is likely to improve driver
safety considerably.
},
}