Implementation details about switching between GL reasoning modes
GL's various reasoning modes are implemented using defattach. There are several functions that need to have proper attachments in order for GL to function; when the GL library is loaded, they are set up to a default configuration in which GL will use BDD-based reasoning.
The functions that need attachments follow. Here, BFR stands for Boolean function representation.
BFR-MODE: 0-ary with no constraints. This detemines whether the Boolean function components in the symbolic object representation are BDDs or AIGs, and thus the functions used to combine them. E.g., the definition of BFR-NOT is (basically):
Similarly, BFR-EVAL either applies EVAL-BDD or AIG-EVAL, depending on BFR-MODE.
By default the function BFR-BDD (which returns NIL) is attached to BFR-MODE, and thus BFR-NOT uses the BDD operation Q-NOT. To use AIGs instead, attach BFR-AIG, which returns T.
BFR-SAT: Unary, returning three values: SAT, SUCCEEDED, CTREX. The main constraint of BFR-SAT is that if it returns SAT=NIL and SUCCEEDED=T, then BFR-EVAL of the input on any environment must be NIL, i.e., the input must be an unsatisfiable BDD or AIG (depending on the BFR-MODE.) The CTREX value should be a counterexample in the case of a SAT result, represented either as a BDD or an alist mapping variables to Boolean values; see below under BFR-COUNTEREX-MODE.
To satisfy the constraint in the BDD case, it suffices to simply check whether the input BDD is NIL; if so, it is satisfiable, and otherwise, it isn't. This method is implemented as BFR-SAT-BDD, which is the default attachment of BFR-SAT. For AIG mode, we provide an attachment BFR-SAT-BDDIFY which solves an AIG satisfiability query by transforming the input AIG into a BDD. However, one might instead hook up a SAT solver into ACL2 so that it can take an AIG as input. Given a way of calling such an external tool, it would not be difficult to produce a function that conforms to the constraint described above. :-)
BFR-COUNTEREX-MODE: 0-ary, no constraints. This says whether the counterexample value sometimes returned by BFR-SAT is in the form of a BDD or an association list. If it is set up wrong, then output in case of a counterexample will be garbled. In both the default BDD mode and in the AIG BDDIFY mode provided, the counterexample is in the form of a BDD, and so we attach BFR-COUNTEREX-BDD by default. However, if an external SAT solver is used, then there will likely be a single assignment returned, which might more conveniently be provided as an alist. Then one would instead attach BFR-COUNTEREX-ALIST.