next up previous
Next: Evaluation Methodology Up: Specifics of the solution Previous: Identifying factors

Performance Metrics

Since the devices in concern include small portable devices, the most important criteria for performance evaluation would be
1.
Speed of encryption
2.
Battery power consumed
3.
Costs of hardware encryption (eg chip area, additional power)
4.
Memory required

Because network communication is expected to be an integral component of C0PE, a natural standard for analysis is the network. A typical analysis would be of the form, ``Can all devices on a IrDA network sustain encryption at that bandwidth i.e at 115 Kbps ?. If encryption can keep up with the network, use much less power, much less chip space and cost much less than the network, then universal encryption makes sense. Otherwise, the sophisticated knobs would seem necessary.

It must be noted that the level of security attainable is not an issue to be considered. This is because we are essentially studying the feasibility of ``strong'' encryption. Also, as seen from [Schneier99], most proposed strategies for AES, the future standard for encryption seem to perform independantly of the key lengths used. Hence, we believe that security is really a second-order concern.


next up previous
Next: Evaluation Methodology Up: Specifics of the solution Previous: Identifying factors
Ramadass Nagarajan
2000-03-21