A. Program Design (25%)

Rating	Criteria
25	Solution well thought out
15	Solution partially planned out
05	ad hoc solution; program "designed at the keyboard"

B. Program Execution (20%)

Rating	Criteria
20	Program runs correctly
12	Program produces correct output half of the time
04	Program runs, but mostly incorrectly
0	Program does not compile or run at all

C. Specification Satisfaction (25%)

Rating	Criteria
25	Program satisfies specification completely and correctly
15	Many parts of the specification not implemented
05	Program does not satisfy specification

D. Coding Style (20%)

Rating	Criteria
20	Well-formatted, understandable code; appropriate use of language capabilities
12	Code hard to follow in one reading; poor use of language capabilites
04	Incomprehensive code, appropriate language capabilites not used

E. Comments (10%)

Rating	Criteria
10	Concise, meaningful, well- formatted comments
06	Partial, poorly written or poorly formatted comments
04	Wordy, unnecessary, incorrect, or badly formatted comments
0	No comments at all

F. Extra Credit (10%)

Rating	Criteria
04	Programs that usefully extend the requirements
03	Programs that use a particularly good algorithm
03	Programs that are particularly well written or use the capabilities of the language particularly well