Publications

Threshold cryptography is a standard technique for distributing trust by splitting cryptographic keys into multiple shares held by different parties. The classic model of threshold cryptography assumes either that a trusted dealer distributes the shares to the different parties (and in doing so, also knows the overall secret) or that the users participate in an interactive distributed key-generation protocol to derive their individual shares. In recent years, several works have proposed a new model where users can independently choose a public key, and there is a public and deterministic function that derives the joint public key associated with a group of users from their individual keys. Schemes with this silent (i.e., non-interactive) setup procedure allow us to take advantage of the utility of threshold cryptography without needing to rely on a trusted dealer or an expensive interactive setup phase.

Existing works have primarily focused on threshold policies. This includes notions like threshold signatures (resp., encryption) with silent setup (where only quorums with at least \( T \) users can sign (resp., decrypt) a message) and distributed broadcast encryption (a special case of threshold encryption where the threshold is 1). Currently, constructions that support general threshold policies either rely on strong tools such as indistinguishability obfuscation and witness encryption, or analyze security in idealized models like the generic bilinear group model. The use of idealized models is due to the reliance on techniques for constructing succinct non-interactive arguments of knowledge (SNARKs).

In this work, we introduce a new pairing-based approach for constructing threshold signatures and encryption schemes with silent setup. On the one hand, our techniques directly allow us to support expressive policies like monotone Boolean formulas in addition to thresholds. On the other hand, we only rely on basic algebraic tools (i.e., a simple cross-term cancellation strategy), which yields constructions with shorter signatures and ciphertexts compared to previous pairing-based constructions. As an added bonus, we can also prove (static) security under \( q \)-type assumptions in the plain model. Concretely, the signature size in our distributed threshold signature scheme is 3 group elements and the ciphertext size in our distributed threshold encryption scheme is 4 group elements (together with a short tag).